Borough Examines Retrofitting Public Buildings With Solar Panels
The borough hopes to be in a position to bid on the installation of solar panels in about one year.
More than a year since council began to discuss installing solar panels atop some of the town's public buildings, the borough has begun meeting with solar providers about collector installation.
Borough manager Tom Metzler met recently with Johnson Controls, a leading global provider of products and services that optimizes energy and operational efficiencies of buildings, to discuss retrofitting the roofs of both the public library and public works garage.
The borough ultimately expects to secure a win-win deal with a provider who would finance the entire installation project, while the town generates a consistent savings on its electric bill.
“They are making the investment, not us," Metzler said. "So they need to make sure that it’s a project large enough that it’s going to warrant enough power generation for them to get a return on their investment.”
He said that because the amount of power that would be generated from retrofitting the library and public works garage roofs would achieve only half of what the developer requires to commit to the project, the borough had begun determining the feasibility of installing solar panels on additional public buildings.
Due to the nature of the public bidding process on the project, Metzler declined to share what other buildings the borough was considering retrofitting or how much the project was projected to save the borough.
“While this company has agreed to do the development work for us for nothing, for an opportunity to bid on it, other companies could bid against them so it would give the other companies an unfair advantage to know where they are," explained Metzler, who added that the borough expects to achieve significant savings by installing the collectors.
At this point, he said the borough is likely another year away from being in a position to select a bidder and perform the installation.
“There’s x amount of people and x amount of projects and you’re restricted by time," he said. "It’s a question of priorities."
--
Follow Fair Lawn Patch on Facebook and Twitter, and subscribe to receive our daily newsletter in your inbox each morning
Tommy P
2:55 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Mr Metzler those are government documents subject to disclosure. Any company that wants them, can have them. Frankly, you may even be violating the law, again.
Now for the common sense that Mr Metzler is obviously lacking, no company would make the investment without a profit. The only way a solar system can make money would be for electricity prices to remain high. With NJ out of REGGI, natural gas prices down, etc, unless we guarantee to pay a minimum price for electricity above market rates, the deal is not going to happen.
Mr Metzler, stop wasting tax payers money by wasting your time on this.
Jenne
10:34 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Tommy, so when you are making a sales pitch to a government institution for the right to break into their computer systems for testing purposes, your sales info, notes and files are 'government documents subject to disclosure' ? Betcha not.
Tommy P
12:14 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
I work very hard for the government, but I do not do government work. Besides, FOIA and OPRA have exclusions for security, not sure either has an exclusion for the work product described above. But I'm not a lawyer.
fred
6:06 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Apparently, Mr Metzler has nothing else to do with him time.
Bruce Knuckle
6:26 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Mr Metzler....stop wasting money and covering up for your friends.....
http://www.northjersey.com/news/161126905_Fair_Lawn_officials_mum_on_status_of_Capt__Cook.html
Ally Shuster Shea
9:50 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
(cough** cough** )pay to play.....
Chris D
7:33 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Solar panel = major expense per panel plus installation ~ ~ payoff = 30 yrs ~ ~ Lifespan of a panel = 15 yrs. Where's the cost savings????? Let's move on to more important issues in Fair Lawn.
Jenne
10:32 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
The way these projects work is that the company doing it pays for the panels and installation, and gets the money for the excess electricity. In exchange for hosting the panels, Fair Lawn gets cheaper electricity. The numbers you are quoting are for residential installations commercially installed and paid for by the homeowner (and they are the same numbers people were quoting 10 years ago before the growth of the solar industry, so I'm skeptical.)
As for Tommy's whining, as long as we continue to have electricity shortages due to excessive use of AC, there will be a market for excess electricity on hot sunny days.
If they come up with a plan that will cost Fair Lawn money, do your whining then. Otherwise wait and see.
Tommy P
12:19 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Jenne, it's real easy to isolate consumption and pretend its the problem. Has the thought occurred to you that the government's interference in the energy market is the problem. There is crude oil in NJ, yet we don't produce any. We are hardly unique as a state. We have massive reserves of natural gas, yet we don't get much of that.
If solar works so well, why doesn't private industry rent our roofs and sell the power on their own? Why force us to buy it a minimum price?
Billy Mays
7:37 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
This is an issue that Donovan pushed. Makes sense that her puppets are following her orders.
FL-Rez
6:23 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
What is the cost to replace the panels if they are damaged? Who pays for this cost, and what is the cost of disposing of the damaged or old panels?