patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Council Urged to Act Now on Next Year's $900,000 Shortfall [Poll]

Borough manager Tom Metzler urged council to act now to make up a $900,000 shortfall in next year's budget or risk disastrous results in the future

 

The borough of Fair Lawn is at a financial tipping point, borough manager Tom Metzler said glumly at Tuesday's budget meeting.

Even considering all of the additional revenue the borough expects to bring in with ambulance billing, water billing, municipal court revenue and FEMA money to reimburse storm damages, Fair Lawn faces a $900,000 shortfall for next year's budget.

"There’s only three ways to offset that number without it having a tremendous impact," Metzler said. "None of the options are good ones."

Metzler said council needed to give him guidance on which approach he should take moving forward: increase revenue via more fees (taxation), cut services or deplete the surplus.

He did not recommend balancing the budget by utilizing more of the surplus, as past councils have done.

"If you take another million dollars or $900,000 from surplus next year, you will certainly be within striking range of every community that you’ve read about in the Bergen Record over the last three weeks that are all going out for referendums with crazy tax increases," he said. "Why? Because they’ve depleted their surpluses."

As manager, Metzler has long been an advocate of maintaining a strong surplus, which he believes makes for a strong community. During his previous tenure, Fair Lawn's surplus peaked at $10 million -- twice what it has been under any other manager in the past dozen years.

"You can disagree with me on what the strength of the surplus should be or not be," he said. "But I think there’s enough of a track record over the last couple of weeks with what’s happening with other towns that you all should know what’s going to happen if you deplete your surplus. That’s your only saving grace."

Metzler asked councilmembers to make the tough decision this year, in order to avoid financial catastrophe next year and give the town time to plan ahead for the necessary changes.

"It’s got to be addressed this year or it’s going to have a serious impact on our residents next year," he said. "If you plan on doing it through cuts, I’m urging you to give administration some guidance on what it is you’re looking to cut, so we can at least do a realistic study and tell you how it’s going to impact."

Chief financial officer Karen Palermo echoed Metzler's point.

"We have to address it this year," she said. "We need to know where we’re going because we don’t have the surplus. It’s just going down and down and down."

Metzler said the shortfall is too great to made up with furloughs alone, and that layoffs are guaranteed to bring reductions in service given the borough's already bare bones workforce staffing.

Taking into consideration the recent, and at times contentious, party-line voting that has played out on proposed fee increases for water meter service charges and home alarms, Metzler asked council members to band together when tackling the shortfall and approach it as a collective unit.

"If the public is going to buy into the urgency, you’ve got to do it united," he said. "You can’t do it divided."

Council doesn't have long before a decision is needed. Its budget wrap-up is scheduled for April 16 at 5 p.m. and the budget will be introduced on April 24.

"What you as a council decide on with this budget, I’m telling you, it’s going to determine what the future of this town is. It’s in your hands," Metzler said. "You can kick the can one more year, but next year is it. It’s either increase revenue, deplete your surplus or cut services, that’s it. It’s not a question of if, it’s a question of to what degree."

  • How should the council make up for the nearly $1 million budget shortfall in 2013?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Increase fees/Taxation
        37 (12%)
    • Cut Services
        246 (80%)
    • Deplete what's left of the surplus
        22 (7%)
    Total votes: 305
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: fair lawn budget and fair lawn budget shortfall

blazin101

7:08 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Another fine job done by our clueless leaders!

Reply

The Most Interesting Man in the World

7:43 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

It is always better to be proactive than reactive.

Reply

Tommy P

7:56 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

The lies continue. Just a few weeks ago they were planning on how to spend "extra" money found in the budget and now they are planning to be short almost a MILLION dollars? When will the plunder end?

Reply

LENNY

8:17 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

for 8 weeks to use a pool over a quarter of a million dollars cost to do this
my vote do not open the pool this year.

Reply

Michael Agosta

9:11 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Zak,
Why would you delete my comment about Ed and Jeanne's pal that helped his lawyer friend get a no bid county contract? It was in the Record.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tommy P

11:17 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Could it be that Zak is trying to court favor to continue to get the inside track on what the Republicans want to be news?

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Zak Koeske

11:34 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

@Michael I haven't deleted any comments.

Sally J

11:08 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

I don't think Metzler should be proud of the fact that he kept $10million of taxpayers money just sitting in an account. That is not his money it is ours. I do agree that you need a healthy surplus for emergencies and to keep infustracture going but $10million dollars!? That seems a little outrageous. If this were a household budget it would be absurd to keep that much money in a savings account for emergencies. Perhaps they should have used some of that money to lessen the tax burden or invest it in revenue building projects that can also better the community.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tommy P

11:18 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

They should use it to pay down debt.

Comment_arrow

Daniel Dunay

11:54 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Ms. Sally J, the unfortunate reality is that the prior administration, led by then Mayor Swain, burned through the surplus in only three years. The surplus is no longer $10 million, as Zak made quite clear in the article above. I believe Mr. Metzler is now operating the town with approximately $2mm cushion, per a comment he made at a council meeting several months ago. That is less than 5% of the town's annual operating budget. Is it your position that we should eliminate our savings entirely and leave nothing for an emergency? Is that your idea of prudent fiscal management?

Comment_arrow

BellairBerdan

12:00 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

He used it to buy a new car. That's what got him in trouble in the first place.

Comment_arrow

Chris Antonelli

12:03 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Sally,

10M in the borough surplus should be relative to your household income if you're going to put in in those terms. In the last year ending 11/2011, we had 3 major weather events. Snowstorm with +/- 2 feet of snow, a tropical storm with epic flooding, and the Halloween snow that put parts of the borough without power for days. These events tend to rack up tons of overtime on the part of Boro workers and the FLPD (Who, BTW, did an excellent job). I'd rather pull money from the surplus than have to borrow or bond for something else. The surplus should be there. I'd look for ways to cut first before raising taxes.

Comment_arrow

Sally J

4:38 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Mr. Dunay...I don't think you understand my comment. I am simply saying that in my opinion a $10 million in surplus is not something we need in this town. That is taxpayer money and I think if a surplus reached that amount we should give it back to the residents. That is tax payer money and it shouldn't be sitting in a bank account. I agree that we need more than a $2 million dollar surplus I just think $10 million is absurd (although I don't really trust Mr. Metzler's numbers...if you remember when he was asked the highest number of false alarms a person has had in Fair Lawn he said 200 when the number was actually 20.)

Comment_arrow

Daniel Dunay

5:08 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Ms. Sally J, that is a fair perspective. I would just note that all of Mr. Metzler's figures are or will soon be publicly available in financial statements and budget documents...you could easily confirm them all if you really don't trust the figures. I think you'll find that they hold up.

Comment_arrow

Harry

1:28 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Invest in revenue building projects? Has anyone seen the government invest in anything that made money back for the taxpayer? All they do is chase more money after bad money.

Brent Pohlman

12:28 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

BB are you uninformed or disingenuous? Because as I recall the monies used to purchase the new Borough owned vehicle for the Borough Manager did not come from the surplus, rather from a Borough credit line.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tommy P

12:43 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Is this the car that got him fired with a $15,000 year payment or another one?

The Most Interesting Man in the World

2:19 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Metzler was fired over politics. He was replacing an old vehicle that the homeless would be embarrassed to use as a rest room. Evil Joe wanted to be the manager and could not be and had a hard time running rough shod over Metzler, so they got rid of him for a superfluious reason.

Reply
Comment_arrow

me2

2:51 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

thats interesting... although i once heard about a guy who lives vicariously through himself and once taught a German shepherd to bark in Spanish.
therefore you are not the most interesting man in the world

Comment_arrow

The Most Interesting Man in the World

3:28 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

In another vicarious moment last week I had what makes me a man cloned so I could entertain Miss March and Miss April simultaneously....STMF!

Comment_arrow

The Most Interesting Man in the World

4:03 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

@me2, believe wha t you want, but I think that makes me at least a little more intersting than you, LOL!

Ezra P.

10:40 am on Friday, April 6, 2012

Ok - how about something practical.... How much does it cost to pick up trash 2x/week in summer? While it is convenient, how necessary is it? I imagine the concern is the heat/garbage/smell issue - but I have not been here long enough to know the details...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tommy P

11:41 am on Friday, April 6, 2012

Practical doesn't matter, increase budgets mean increase power for temporary politicians. It also means that the "other side" doesn't get to use that cut against you in a sound bite.

Just Facts

9:52 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012

Didnt they just OK two brand new Fire Trucks? Like real big money?? I say keep the old fire trucks - they really arent that old...... I see NY City trucks rolling from the 80's.... none of our trucks are even close to that age... Hold on to our shiney trucks a couple more years.....

Reply

The TRUTH

7:48 am on Sunday, April 8, 2012

@Just Facts Nobody gave any ok in Fair Lawn for new firetrucks. I think you need to get your facts straight before you post your comments. And FYI, Fair Lawn's Engine 5 is a 1985 model year!!!

Reply

John C

12:52 am on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

In 2009 or 2010 there was an article in the paper reporting the town had a 9 million dollar surplus. At the time I thought to myself good for them being prepared for this economic disaster. Two years later you have a 10 million dollar surplus, but there is is still a shortfall. To me it seem you are still trying to increase your surplus out of our pockets.

Reply

Leave a comment