Council Gets Early Start on 2013 Budget Shortfall
Council has asked the borough manager to prepare a list of possible service cuts for next year so it can discuss the merits of each as soon as possible.
Recognizing that the borough faces at least a half-million dollar shortfall in 2013, council opted Tuesday to immediately begin discussions on how best to balance next year’s budget.
At Deputy Mayor John Cosgrove’s request, the borough manager will prepare for council within the next 60 days a plan outlining a number of feasible service cuts and the amount each cut is expected to save the borough.
Manager Tom Metzler suggested that the 2013 budget be discussed at every future work session, so the latest information and proposed budget solutions can be shared between town administrators and the council on an ongoing basis.
“The more information the better,” he said. “Let’s find out where it takes us.”
Once council has agreed on a list of potential cuts, Metzler suggested the town mail property owners a survey along with next quarter’s property tax bills to gauge their service preferences.
“Let’s find out from our residents what services they want, what services they don’t want, what are acceptable cuts,” he said.
As part of Metzler’s proposal, each returned survey would be tied to a specific lot and block number, which would allow the borough to glean additional geographic and demographic information about responders.
“Every property owner would at least have the opportunity to tell us what they think and we’d be able to break it down by commercial properties versus residential properties,” he said.
Deputy Mayor Ed Trawinski spoke up on behalf of renters in Fair Lawn, asking the manager to ensure that owners of apartment complexes in town distribute surveys to their tenants.
Simultaneously, Metzler said he was reviewing the borough's operational structure following comments councilman Kurt Peluso made last week about what he considers to be the top-heavy nature of the recreation department.
"There were some very valid questions that were asked with regard to ratio of supervision," Metzler said. "Just because this is the way we’ve operated for the last 20 years doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the right way to be operating."
Although a full report isn't expected for another 45 days, Metzler said they'd already found one instance where the borough is paying more to outsource a service than it would cost to keep that service in house.
Tommy P
8:10 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Refreshing news from Borough Hall! They are no longer thinking about cutting our budgets but finally about cutting their waste.
Stuart Pace
8:22 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
why would tenants get a survey?
Tommy P
8:28 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
They vote.
Bruce Knuckle
8:46 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Trawinski must have a big voting block in the renters. Once again, he worries more about those using up the services instead of those paying for it. He should let the landlords worry about their tenants.
progress
9:23 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
i really like the voting idea and think the manager and council are making small steps to improvement. however i dont understand why tenants would get a vote. if i was renting in town i would vote to keep every service because i would be gettting all the benefits without paying extra taxes for them
Tommy P
9:26 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Its not a vote, its a survey. They are going to maintain the list, gleam demographics, etc. They fear the vote at the ballot box.
Zak Koeske
9:39 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
@progress The survey will ask residents/tenants/property owners what services they feel are essential and what aren't as essential. A rank order of sorts, to get better information on what truly matters to people. So even if someone would prefer to keep all services, they'll be asked to choose which are the most important to them and that will give the council a better idea of the town's mindset
Michael Agosta
8:15 am on Thursday, May 3, 2012
Zak
That will give the council a better idea of the town's mindset?
So, of the three candidates that ran for election last year, none of them have an idea what the people want?
Now I understand.
Stuart Pace
11:09 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
My apologies to tenants . Their rent pays the landlord taxes and they should have a voice. A dear friend pointed out my stupidity
Tommy P
11:26 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
This is exactly why you should have been elected over either one of the (d)s, your a big enough man to admit a mistake. I'd vote for you again!
Michael Agosta
8:17 am on Thursday, May 3, 2012
Stu,
Whatcha doin in 2013?