patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Council OKs 4-Day Workweek for Municipal Building

Starting June 28, the municipal building will have extended hours of operation Monday through Thursday and be closed on Fridays.

 

If you've historically chosen to conduct municipal business on Fridays, it might be time to pick a new day -- at least for the summer.

In less than a month, the borough will roll out an experimental plan that puts the municipal building and its employees on a four-day work schedule for the 10-week period from June 28 through Sept. 5.

During that time, the building will open a half-hour earlier and close an hour later Monday through Thursday -- from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. -- and be closed entirely (except for the police department) on Friday. 

Borough manager Tom Metzler said the change is being made in an attempt to eliminate built-in employee overtime and comp time that is accrued when municipal building employees routinely work evening hours.

Under the four-day plan, the borough will introduce flexible employee scheduling, so that employees with regular evening duties can start and end work later without accruing overtime. 

“We have a lot of jobs in this borough that require work to be done on odd hours,” he said. “And there’s savings to be made by having people work those hours that we need them. You start seeing repetitive hours it makes sense to rework your schedules.”

As it was originally proposed, the four-day workweek was slated to only extend the work day and include one "late day" on Wednesday to coincide with weekly municipal court sessions - a major overtime generator. That idea was dropped, however, after discussions with department heads and employees revealed that residents are more likely to stop by early in the morning than late in the evening, and thus starting the day earlier would likely accomodate more residents.

"Over the years we’ve tried to have open late nights and people don’t come," borough clerk Joanne Kwasniewski explained. "The reason that I suggested [opening earlier] is because every day I get here about 8, as does Tom, and there’s always people waiting."

While several council members initially expressed concern that an 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. work day would actually prohibit commuters from coming either before or after work, they ultimately consented to move forward with a trial run.

"My concern is the residents having their needs met," councilwoman Lisa Swain said. "So if you are seeing the greatest number of residents coming at 8 o’clock then maybe there is merit to moving it earlier."

Deputy Mayor Ed Trawinski said he'd defer to the experience of municipal building employees and support the time switch on a trial basis.

"If we get a lot of complaints about people who say 'I can’t make it during those hours and the fact that you’re closed on Fridays is a problem,' we’ll revisit it the next time we structure it," he said. "Let’s take it through a season and give it a shot."

The four-day workweek is not expected to be permanent. 

Rather, it represents a giveback to employees for their willingness to accept working a flexible schedule that should significantly reduce or eliminate their overtime. 

“Take something, give something,” Metzler said. “We are effectively asking our employees, once again, to give something up -- it’s called overtime. So this is a mutual effort. You be flexible with your hours, we’ll let you be home on Fridays during the summer.”

If the borough’s proposed flexible scheduling trial run is successful, Metzler said he would negotiate expanding flexible hours to all borough employees when he begins contract negotiations with his bargaining units in a couple months. 

As part of the upcoming negotiations, Metzler said it's imperative to get creative with the borough's limited revenue and reward employees who haven't had a raise in years.

"What I’m trying to do is shift some of that money that we’re seeing in overtime into the salary and wage as we move forward," he said. "So, hypothetically an employee who’s working 60 hours a week instead of 40 hours a week and has come to depend on that overtime because it’s built in, they’ll be working less hours but still see an increase in their salary."

Metzler said the annual amount in overtime -- including police overtime -- paid to borough employess was about $1.3 million.

--

Follow Fair Lawn Patch on Facebook and Twitter, and subscribe to receive our daily newsletter in your inbox each morning

  • What do you think of the proposed four days per week operation at the municipal building?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • The extended hours Monday through Thursday will be helpful given my busy work schedule
        59 (37%)
    • Not being able to come in on Fridays will prove to be a major inconvenience
        31 (19%)
    • It will have no effect on me
        68 (43%)
    Total votes: 158
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: fair lawn 4 day workweek, fair lawn borough employees, fair lawn borough hours, fair lawn employee overtime, and fair lawn municipal building

Tommy P

9:26 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

If they reduce the work week from 40 to 38 hours, will they cut everyone's pay by 5% to match the 5% reduction in hours? How exactly is this going ton save money since the police deptartment is the largest user of the building?

This idea that employees are some how entitled to overtime is absurd and should be ended IMMEDIATELY.

Sounds to me like Metzler wants 10, 3 day weekends, Tom, great name, nice idea for you, but if you want those days, use vacation time.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Zak Koeske

9:50 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

@Thomas Municipal building employees will continue to work 35 hours/week. They currently work five days per week, 8 hours per day with 1 hour for lunch. With this new plan, it'll be four days per week, 9.5 hours per day with 45 minutes for lunch.

Comment_arrow

Tommy P

11:45 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

That should be the headline, while taxpayers are asked to dig deeper, borough employees only 35 hours per week.

Comment_arrow

Bruce Knuckle

7:10 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

TP.....Workers should put in extra time for free? You post some pretty dopey stuff, but that is dumb. Lets work them like slaves while were at it too . If the council staffed correctly, and the leadership actually did something (especially in the PD) maybe overtime wouldn't be needed nearly as much. Its not the overtime killing FL, its poor leadership with zero long term planning.

Comment_arrow

Jenne

7:15 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Dude, it's called federal law. Hourly employees, 'non-exempt employees', are entitled to overtime pay if they work overtime. Even salaried, 'exempt' professionals are supposed to get overtime if they are routinely scheduled for more than 40 hours, though it's unusual for them to get it, unless they are on contract.
Change the schedule, and then they aren't working overtime, we're not paying overtime.
If you work 9 to 5 and get an hour for lunch, you may be 'working' 35 hours yourself. Get over it.

Comment_arrow

The Most Interesting Man in the World

8:47 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Jenne knows what she is talking about. When I had a large number of employees working for me and certain hours had to be accommodated, I just started and ended employees hours in order to accomplish the task instead of entitling them to overtime and hired part timers to fill in the gaps rather than overtime as well. If I had a need to have someone there till 8 PM, there is nothing wrong with starting them at noon. With the exception of an emergency, there should no scheduled overtime. Spending more than a million on overtime seems like a huge mismanagement of time and I am glad to see this is being looked at.

Comment_arrow

Tommy P

10:48 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Bruce, employment terms change, we should make the change, if an employee doesn't like it, there is no gun to their head to keep the job. Many others would like to fill those jobs. In this day and age to have workforce which works fewer than 40 hours is absurd.

The council can simply pass a resolution or ordinance to fix the problem. Our staff makes significantly more than all our neighboring towns. There is no reason a full time hour employee who makes more than $30hr should be non-exempt. Stewart Pace was right, we need to address this problem, NOW.

Just Facts

12:15 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

You can slice and dice this all you want however there is still alot of work to run a town that HAS to get done.....So what happens now when we need something on Friday?? anyone study if workers still work effectively into the ninth and tenth hour?.. and after they make this money saving move, when will my taxes be reduced? haha I say they should work every day 5 hours a day - split the staffing and have coverage all the time.... What do you think of that?? experts....ha

Reply

Just Facts

12:25 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Fair Lawn is a nice town - not by accident - the men and women who work there do a good job - I just hope this doenst negitively effect their good work....

Reply

Ezra P.

4:50 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Even in the fall if they go back to regular hours - there should still be some sort of flexible scheduling. If a worker needs to be at a meeting in the evening - start them later in the day. If there is some critical position that needs to be available at 8:30am - then hire a part time person to fill in at those times. To "Just Facts" barring an emergency, people should not be working 9-10 hour days as clearly they currently are - are presumably not as effectively. For the most part, the people who have to work an odd hour - this is a known fact, known in advance and coverage can be arranged.

Reply

John Christopher

6:34 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Truth be told taxpayers get screwed paying more and getting less. Fair lawn is watered down because of poor government leadership. In the end taxpayers again Lose

Reply

BlueCollarGuy

6:50 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

I read the posts by TP and suddenly realized that there is no coincidence i. His initials being " TP".

Reply

Leave a comment