Bill Would Stretch the School Day, Extend the School Year

Three-year pilot would be funded by corporate contributions that would earn 100 percent tax credits

A Democratic-backed bill aimed at extending the school day and the school year could morph into a broader measure that also pays districts to experiment with innovative approaches as to how time is used in schools.

The bill (S-2087) would furnish up to 25 districts with grant funding to evaluate longer school schedules. The pilot would run for three years and be paid for with corporate contributions that in turn would earn 100 percent state tax credits.

The measure passed the Senate Education Committee yesterday; it was voted out by the Assembly education committee in June.

Just as soon as it passed, one of its chief Senate sponsors said yesterday that she would revise the bill significantly before taking it to a full vote, opening up both the programs available for grant funding and the financing mechanisms to pay for them.

“Let’s really raise the bar,” said state Sen. Teresa Ruiz (D-Essex), chairman of the Senate committee. “Let’s see what other best practices we can weave into this to make this a comprehensive bill.”

“I wanted to get the conversation going, and get everyone moving on this,” she said.

Ruiz said the bill could complement a proposal by the Christie administration to set up a so-called Innovation Fund in the fiscal 2014 state budget. It would provide $50 million in grants for a range of yet undefined projects.

If the new measure passes, it would award comparable sums for stretching daily and annual schedules, as well as for other scheduling innovations: up to $24 million in the first year, $48 million in the second, and $72 million in the third.

Ruiz yesterday said she still wanted to keep the focus on extended schedules, pointing to growing support for longer time in the classroom. Still, she said the current bill needed some stricter guidelines as to what districts could try.

“While I don’t want the state to tell districts what these will look like, we should set down some parameters,” Ruiz said after the committee hearing.

Cosponsored by state Sen. Shirley Turner (D-Mercer), the current bill would require a district to have the support of a majority of its families and its staff to even apply for the funding. The state would pick a cross-section of districts (geographically and socio-economically) to participate in the pilot.

Continue reading this article at NJ Spotlight.com

June September 26, 2012 at 04:38 PM
Peggy September 27, 2012 at 01:27 PM
June, why is it ridiculous? An extra half hour per day of classes would benefit the children greatly. In addition, why do we need a week off in February? This would add 5 days to the school year.
FLResident98 September 27, 2012 at 02:40 PM
I would lean towards ridiculous. School hours plus homework hours already eat up more then enough family hours. As for the Feb. break-purely a financial decision. It saves money on heating costsfor the building to be closed for one week during one of the colder months.
Peggy September 27, 2012 at 04:40 PM
FL resident98: I presume you've been a resident since 1998. I've been a resident since 1961, but that's irrelevant. Perhaps if they had the extra half hour in school, they wouldn't have to have so much homework, and do you really think there is much saving of heatings costs? The custodians still work during the Feb. break, don't they? I'm sure they have the heat on.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »